In “New Alarm Bells About Chemicals and Cancer” (column, May 6), Nicholas D. Kristof drew attention to a document being released by the President’s Cancer Panel that warns that, in Mr. Kristof’s words, “our lackadaisical approach to regulation may have far-reaching consequences for our health.”
Mr. Kristof argues that “protecting ourselves and our children from toxins should be an effort that both parties can get behind — if enough members of Congress are willing to put the public interest ahead of corporate interests,” and I could not agree more.
While our government and industries may have little control over enormous pollution disasters like the recent oil spill and the health and environmental repercussions they will create, closer regulation of potentially carcinogenic chemicals is within our reach and should be looked at much more seriously.
Eden Stiffman
Ann Arbor, Mich., May 6, 2010
•
To the Editor:
If Nicholas D. Kristof’s intention was to frighten his readers, he succeeded with this one. As a physician, I am aware of the multiple risks in our environment. I pause when wrapping a cut lemon in plastic wrap before putting it in the refrigerator. But to see a comprehensive and formal alert by the presidential panel makes one feel doomed.
Jose Sotolongo
Kingston, N.Y., May 6, 2010
•
To the Editor:
As a survivor of Stage IV non-Hodgkins lymphoma, I found that Nicholas D. Kristof’s column resonated with me, and had several healthful tips.
I better understand now why our daughter, with two preschool children, rejected the plastic microwave cover we brought one day, and let the sod in the backyard go untreated with weedkiller.
A useful gadget for children and parents is a water pen, which gives a digital readout when dipped in water at school, in parks, when traveling and so on. The variations in water quality are significant, especially between filtered and nonfiltered tap water.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/08/opinion/l08kristof.html
NSA Water Filters